Abstract
Gram-staining remains the fundamental method for determinative bacteriology, dividing bacteria into Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. This test provides information as to the origin of any contamination and is a pre-requisite for many microbial identification methods. Despite the longevity of the test, the test is highly reliant upon analyst technique and therefore errors occur. While there are a few studies looking at errors in the clinical context, research has not been extended to the pharmaceutical microbiology laboratory context. In this study, we present a review of over 6,000 Gram-stains and establish an error rate of around 3%, with the most common reason for error being an over-decolourisation step resulting in organisms that should be Gram-positive appearing as Gram-negative. The analysis enables others to benchmark their facilities against.
Publisher
Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Sciences Society (PHSS)
Reference26 articles.
1. Sogaard M, Norgaard M, Schonheyder HC (2007) First notification of positive blood cultures and the high accuracy of the gram stain report. J Clin Microbiol45:1113–11172.
2. Strand CL (2006) Positive blood cultures: can we always trust the Gram stain? Am J Clin Pathol126:671–6723.
3. Musher DM, Montoya R, Wanahita A. (2004) Diagnostic value of microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum and sputum cultures in patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis39:165–1694.
4. Sandle, T. (2004) Gram’s Stain: History and Explanation of the Fundamental Technique of Determinative Bacteriology, IST Science and Technology Journal, No. 54 ,pp3-45.
5. Gram, H. C. J. (1884): Über die isolirte Färbung der Schizomyceten in Schnitt-und Trockenpräparaten, Fortschritte der Medizin, Berlin, 2: 185-189.6.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献