Are we overtreating patients with malignant colorectal polyps? A 5-year review of the ACPGBI position statement

Author:

Korambayil SM1ORCID,Iyer S1,Moran A1,Beaton C1

Affiliation:

1. Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, UK

Abstract

Introduction In 2013, The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) issued a position statement regarding management of malignant polyps. We reviewed the management of endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyps in a district general hospital to evaluate whether patients were being overtreated as per these guidelines. Methods All patients who underwent a complete, non-piecemeal endoscopic removal of a malignant polyp between October 2013 and September 2018 were studied. Polyps were risk stratified for residual disease and followed up as per the ACPGBI. Patients were divided into two groups based on management after polypectomy. Primary outcome measured was the presence of residual tumour or involved lymph nodes in the resection specimen. Secondary outcomes included complications and recurrence. Results Thirty-three patients were included: 21 in the non-operative group (NOG) and 12 in the operative group (OG). The ACPGBI risk score in the NOG varied between 1 and over 4 compared with the OG who all scored over 4. Two patients in the OG (16%) demonstrated residual disease. Five patients suffered a postoperative complication. No recurrences were noted in the OG and one in the NOG. Conclusion Our findings against a backdrop of the available literature suggest that the risk of residual disease after malignant polypectomy may not be as high as stated by the ACPGBI. As a result, there is a risk of overtreating patients and exposing them to the significant complications of surgery if careful consideration is not exercised.

Publisher

Royal College of Surgeons of England

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Reference14 articles.

1. Loughrey M, Quirke P, Shepherd N. Royal College of Pathologists. Standards and datasets for reporting of colorectal cancer. https://www.rcpath.org/asset/C8B61BA0-AE3F-43F1-85FFD3AB9F17CFE6.7F4D0A7A-A547-4D5C-9A7C50045817CCF0/ (cited May 2020).

2. Management of the malignant colorectal polyp: ACPGBI position statement

3. Long-term survival after treatment of malignant colonic polyps

4. Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. Pathologic assessment of lymph node metastatic potential

5. Endoscopic Polypectomy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3