Open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) versus Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernias

Author:

Berri T12ORCID,Brahmi K3,Seddiki MMSE3

Affiliation:

1. University of Bechar, Algeria

2. New Hospital of Bechar, Algeria

3. University Hospital Center of Oran, Algeria

Abstract

Introduction Chronic postsurgical pain (CPP) remains the main complication after Lichtenstein hernioplasty. The open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) technique is a more recent transinguinal procedure that seems to be associated with less CPP. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of the ONSTEP versus the Lichtenstein procedure for primary inguinal hernia. Methods In this prospective, double-blinded and single-centre clinical trial, CPP at the six-month follow up assessed by a visual analogue scale was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were operative time, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, early pain, time to return to daily activities and to work, pain-related sexual dysfunction, aesthetic satisfaction and recurrence. Results A total of 100 men were allocated to undergo either the Lichtenstein (n=50) or the ONSTEP (n=50) hernioplasty. The incidence of CPP was nonsignificantly lower in the ONSTEP group compared with the Lichtenstein group (28% vs 42%; p=0.142). However, the ONSTEP procedure required less operative time (42 vs 62min; p<0.001). Patients from the ONSTEP group resumed their daily activities earlier (5.94±3.9 days vs 8.56±5.14 days; p=0.009), had fewer postsurgical complications (5 vs 19; p=0.001) and expressed better satisfaction with the cosmetic result (p=0.041). No recurrence was observed after six months of follow up. Conclusion CPP was similar, but the ONSTEP technique was associated with shorter operating time, earlier return to normal daily activities, fewer postsurgical complications and better cosmetic results.

Publisher

Royal College of Surgeons of England

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3