Affiliation:
1. University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2. MARA University of Technology Shah Alam, Malaysia
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most gallbladder carcinoma cases are suspected pre-operatively or intra-operatively. In Malaysia histopathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens has become routine practice. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of routine histological examinations on cholecystectomy specimens from an Asian demographic, which may differ from a Caucasian demographic. METHODS A retrospective study was performed of all histopathoiogy reports for choiecystectomies (Iaparoscopic and open) undertaken over a period of 12 years (1997-2008) in a single teaching hospital. RESULTS A total of 1,375 gallbladder specimens were sent for histopathological analysis, with 7 (0.5%) being reported as malignant while only three (0.2%) were found to contain primary gallbladder carcinoma. Other premalignant findings included two specimens with dyspiastic changes of the mucosa and one tubuioviiious adenoma with a dyspiastic epithelium. From the ten malignant and premalignant specimens, seven were diagnosed pre-operatively, two were suspected intra-operatively and one was diagnosed with dyspiastic changes on the histopathoiogy report post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS This study supports earlier research carried out in the UK and the demographic difference does not affect the impact of the histology examination on cholecystectomy specimens in diagnosing this disease. A selective policy is recommended in Malaysia.
Publisher
Royal College of Surgeons of England
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献