Consenting Practice for Open Inguinal Hernia Repairs – Are We Failing to Warn Patients of Serious Complications?

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Open inguinal hernia repairs are one of the most commonly performed procedures in the UK. The procedure can sometimes result in considerable morbidity. It is imperative that the consenting process for this procedure is meticulous. This allows the patient to make a fully informed decision as they are aware of potential complications. In turn, this reduces the risk of future litigation. The aim of this study was to examine the adequacy of consenting for open inguinal hernia repairs, in particular, focusing on serious risks associated with the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS The notes of male patients who had undergone open inguinal hernia repair over a 6-month period were identified by the IT department. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined, giving a total of 97 male patients. Their consent forms were examined, focusing on: (i) the complications mentioned; and (ii) the grade of the consentor. A proforma was filled in for each of these patients and the data collated. RESULTS Of the 97 patients in the study, 25.7% of patients were consented by a consultant, 54.6% by a specialist registrar, and 19.6% by a senior house officer/FY2. The most commonly recorded risks included infection (100%) and bleeding (100%). Serious complications such as chronic pain (consented for at an average of 14%), testicular complications (45.3%) and visceral injury (52.1%) were poorly accounted for at all levels. CONCLUSIONS Consultants and juniors alike are not adequately consenting patients for inguinal hernia repairs, omitting serious complications such as chronic pain, recurrence and testicular complications. This leaves surgical teams vulnerable to claims for negligence. Good consenting practice may ultimately benefit both patient and surgeon.