Affiliation:
1. Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Countess of Chester Hospital Chester, UK
2. Department of Microbiology, Countess of Chester Hospital Chester, UK
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Marker pens are widely used in surgery but pre-operative marking of patients may be a cause of bacterial cross-infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two experiments were performed to assess whether marking pens can be cause of cross-infection: (i) 26 indelible marker pens were collected from surgical wards for analysis; and (ii) ‘fresh’ as well as ‘dry’ (artificially dried by removing cap and exposing tip for 2 h) new permanent marker pens, and whiteboard marker pens were inoculated by dipping the tips into various concentrations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Each pen was inoculated onto 2 blood agar plates at 0 (immediately after inoculation) to 30 min at various intervals, 4 h and 24 h. The plates were incubated for 18 h at 35°C in an incubator. RESULTS Of 26 pens collected from the wards, 2 cultured Micrococci spp. (skin commensals). The constituents of new ‘fresh’ pen tips rapidly kill MRSA – in all cases by 4 h, but usually within minutes. At high inoculum concentrations, MRSA is not killed immediately. Dry marker pens harbour MRSA for at least 30 min and probably longer. CONCLUSIONS Marker pens can act as fomites for nosocomial infection. The ethanol-based ink in permanent marker pens has a bactericidal action against MRSA that starts within seconds, and they are likely to be safe to use with a gap of at least 2 min between patients. Usually, harmless skin commensals are not pathogenic except in immunocompromised patients. Old or dried-out marker pens can harbour pathogens and should be discarded before attempted use on patients. We recommend disposable markers for the immunocompromised and patients with a known positive MRSA status.
Publisher
Royal College of Surgeons of England
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献