Consent: Luck or Law?

Author:

Elmalik K1,Wheeler RA1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatric Surgery, Southampton General Hospital Southampton, UK

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to identify whether clinicians are obtaining a valid consent for surgery, and ascertain the parents' perception of parental responsibility when giving consent for their children. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults consenting for 100 children were questioned about the possession of parental responsibility, and their understanding of the concept. RESULTS Only 4 children had surgery without valid consent, these forms being signed by fathers without parental responsibility. However, only 5% of the sample stated that parental responsibility was required. More than 80% believed that cohabitation was a sufficient qualification to provide consent; fewer than 15% recognising any influence of marital status. It seems that, although 96% of consenters had parental responsibility, the validity of their consent was a product more of luck than of lawful behaviour. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate a wide gulf between the standards set by the Children Act 1989 and common practice, as perceived by parents. Furthermore, this reveals a significant disparity between the principles behind the statute, and the role that parents believe that they play in the 21st century.

Publisher

Royal College of Surgeons of England

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Reference1 articles.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Consent for the paediatric patient;Faculty Dental Journal;2023-04

2. Knowledge of medical law amongst doctors of internal diseases;International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health;2013-01-01

3. Consent in paediatrics;Surgery (Oxford);2010-01

4. An audit of the level of knowledge and understanding of informed consent amongst consultant orthodontists in England, Wales and Northern Ireland;British Dental Journal;2008-12

5. Paediatric consent;British Dental Journal;2007-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3