To Knot or Not to Knot? Sutureless Haemostasis Compared to the Surgeon's Knot

Author:

Rajbabu K1,Barber NJ1,Choi W1,Muir GH1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, King's College Hospital London, UK

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to carry out an independent evaluation of the efficacy and security of a number of vessel ligation devices and ligatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS A vascular ligation model was devised using fresh, ex vivo porcine internal carotid arteries of varying external diameters. Coloured normal saline was infused via a pressure/monitor device through the artery. The end lumen was occluded by five different techniques: (i) braided suture in a surgeon's knot; (ii) a monofilament suture in a granny knot; (iii) a metallic clip (Ligaclip, Johnson and Johnson); (iv) a bipolar diathermy system (Ligasure, ValleyLab); and (v) an ultrasonically activated scalpel (Harmonic Scalpel, Johnson and Johnson). The vessels were subjected to supraphysiological pressures. Loss of haemostasis was evident by leakage of coloured perfusion fluid. RESULTS Secure haemostasis was obtained with all the techniques in all vessels below 5 mm in diameter. In vessels over 5 mm, secure haemostasis was obtained with all modalities except harmonic scalpel. With the harmonic scalpel, leaks occurred in 3/27 (11%) vessels between 5–6 mm and 3/5 (60%) vessels over 6 mm, confirming the manufacturer's instructions. CONCLUSIONS In this first, independent, randomised study comparing vessel ligation devices and ligatures, the manufacturer's claims for each of the haemostatic methods were accurate. We find that all the modalities tested perform as well as the traditional surgeon's knot in vessels of 5 mm and below.

Publisher

Royal College of Surgeons of England

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3