Evaluation of an Executive Functioning Test Battery in Two Versions with Material Close to Daily Life

Author:

Kallweit Claudia1,Exner Cornelia1

Affiliation:

1. Psychologisches Institut, Arbeitsgruppe für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Abstract

Abstract. The assessment of executive functions (EF) often yields conflicting results between standardized tests and self-ratings (e. g., in depression or adult ADHD). For the present investigation, standardized EF-tasks were enriched in order to better represent executive demands of daily life. In the future this may improve the assessment and prediction of reported performance deficits in daily life. An EF-test battery was designed with material close to daily life; tasks were matched to basic executive functions. Healthy students took part in two preliminary studies to evaluate the reliability, validity, and comparability of five tasks. In the end, four tasks seem suitable, whereas one task underlies several limitations. The tasks can reliably be used and should be re-evaluated in further studies with adult ADHD participants and healthy controls.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Cognitive Neuroscience,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Reference30 articles.

1. Arling, V., Grossmann, L., Palme, S. & Spijkers, W. (2011). Training of planning skills in the context of vocational rehabilitation. In Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, (Ed.), 20. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium (Vol. 93, pp. 96 – 97). Berlin: Heenemann.

2. Predicting Impairment in Major Life Activities and Occupational Functioning in Hyperactive Children as Adults: Self-Reported Executive Function (EF) Deficits Versus EF Tests

3. The Nature of Executive Function (EF) Deficits in Daily Life Activities in Adults with ADHD and Their Relationship to Performance on EF Tests

4. Brickenkamp, R. (2002). d2 Test of Attention (9th ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3