How Substance Use Treatment Professionals Manage Organisational Tensions

Abstract

Abstract. Aims: The study examined how substance use treatment professionals managed problems and tensions in their work, and explored if the strategies varied by organisational features related to New Public Management (NPM). Methods: A total of 69 semi-structured interviews (2017–2018) with treatment staff in nine sampled local/regional areas formed the basis for constructing a web survey administered to staff across Sweden in 2019 (n=606). The means showed how often the different strategies were used. Regression analyses examined organisational differences, and central strategies were illustrated by the interview study. Results: Treatment professionals in general reported satisfactory freedom in their work. Staff in more NPM-like organisations were less likely to report autonomy and more inclined to report conflicting demands. When conflicts emerged, the staff used both passive strategies indicating adaptation or resignation, and active strategies including boundary spanning, protest, and liberty-taking. Some challenging strategies such as looking for other jobs or reporting one thing but doing another were more common in more NPM-like organisations. The opposite was found for customer orientation. Conclusions: While NPM features on customer orientation and steering methods appeared to create fewer problems, more NPM-like organisations appeared to be less favourable overall and should be applied with caution.