Abstract
Consistent with balance theory, it was predicted that a balance is reached when the self and the ingroup are perceived in a similar way, leading participants to more rapid judgments and fewer errors judging the self and the ingroup. The goal of this study was to replicate and extend the results obtained by Smith and Henry (1996) who concluded that ingroup attributes become part of the self-image, thus facilitating the accessibility of self-information. In the present study, we included a condition measuring reaction times for ingroup ratings (as opposed to self-ratings) and found that both ingroup and self-ratings were facilitated when the self- and the ingroup descriptions matched. Therefore it is proposed that a common self-ingroup representation facilitates the access to both the self and the ingroup.
Reference12 articles.
1. Abelson, R. P.
Aronson, E.
McGuire, W. J.
Newcomb, T. M.
Rosenberg, M. J.
Tannenbaum, P. H.
(1968).
Theories of cognitive dissonance: A sourcebook.
Chicago: Rand McNally.
2. The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
3. Cadinu, M. M.
(1996).
Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in
intergroup judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University
of Oregon,
Oregon, U.S.A.
4. Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting.
5. The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献