Die Bedeutung der Klaudikationsstrecke für Patienten mit arterieller Verschlußkrankheit der Beine

Author:

Müller-Bühl 1,Kirchberger 2,Wiesemann 1

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany

2. QUALI-team, Research & Consulting in Health and Social Sciences, Augsburg, Germany

Abstract

Background: Determination of both the pain-free and the maximum walking distances is part of a routine program in the angiological examination of patients with PAOD. It is however as yet not clear which of these two parameters is more relevant in determing a patient’s pathological condition. Patients and methods: In 150 patients with stable intermittent claudication, the claudication pain distance (CPD) and the maximum pain distance (MPD) were determined on a treadmill at 3,0 km/h and 12% inclination. The results were compared with the angiographic findings, the Doppler pressure values and the subjective quality of life (PAVK-86-Questionnaire). Results: The average pain-free walking distance was 89 ± 71m, and the maximum walking distance was 198 ± 141 m. There was no correlation between both walking distances and the angiographic extent of PAOD. Only the MPD correlated with the ankle systolic Doppler pressure and the ankle/brachial pressure index of the claudicating leg (r = 0.16, p < 0.05 and r = 0.20, p < 0.01). Both the CPD and the MDP had a significant influence on the life quality of the patients (CPD: r = –0.41, p < 0.001; MPD: r = –0.47, p < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, beside the body mass index, the MPD was found to be the greatest predictor for the pathologically relevant quality of life dimensions pain, complaints and functional status. Conclusions: The maximum walking distance correlated in a better way than pain-free walking distance with the objective and subjective assessment criteria of PAOD. Therefore, as regards the stage of the disease and the life quality of the patient, this parameter has a greater importance. This fact deserves to receive greater attention in everyday clinical practice and when conducting clinical trials.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3