The venous return simulator: comparison of simulated with measured ambulatory venous pressure in normal subjects and in venous valve incompetence

Author:

Chauveau 1,Gelade 1,Cros 1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoires INNOTHERA Arcueil, France

Abstract

Background: To compare results of numerical simulation of lower limb venous return with those of in vivo measurements, in normal subjects, and those with venous incompetence. Patients and methods: the venous return simulator (VRS) is a mathematical model which takes into account architecture, dimensions, and compliance of the venous network, blood viscosity, valve function, and external pressures (muscular contraction, compression stockings). Using the laws of hydrodynamics, it provides calibres, pressures and flows throughout the network. Ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) computed for some theoretical examples of superficial and /or deep venous incompetence has been compared to in vivo values reported in literature. Results: In a normal subject, computed AVP was 33 mmHg during walking and 30 mmHg with tiptoe exercise; the range of conventionally measured AVP is 20.6 - 27.9 mmHg during walking, and 29 - 32.5 mmHg during tiptoe exercise; In the case of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, computed AVP was 34 or 57 mmHg, according to whether the distal GSV was competent or not. The range of AVP measured in superficial venous insufficiency is 27.6 - 61 mmHg, all but one of the published values lie between the low computed value corresponding to a short reflux and the high computed value due to a long distance reflux. AVP computed in two cases of deep venous incompetence was 44 and 71 mmHg, according to the extent of devalvulation, as compared with the 60 mmHg reported in one clinical study In patients with extensive combined incompetence, computed AVP was 75 mmHg, whilst the range of conventionally measured values was between 62 and 84 mmHg. Conclusions: the good agreement between computed and measured AVP in different cases of valve incompetence indicates that the VRS is quite a realistic model, with the potential to simulate the results of surgery or compression therapy.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3