Early and late outcomes of hybrid endovascular and open repair procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Author:

Balaz Peter1,Rokosny Slavomir1,Wohlfahrt Peter2,Adamec Milos1,Janousek Libor1,Björck Martin3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

2. Center for Cardiovascular Prevention of the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, and Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic, and International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

3. Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Background: Hybrid endovascular and open reconstructions are used increasingly often for multilevel revascularization for lower limb ischaemia. The aim was to evaluate outcomes after such procedures in a single-center non-randomized retrospective study. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with multilevel arterial disease who underwent single session hybrid procedures were analyzed depending on the type of ischaemia and the type of revascularization. Results: 164 patients were included with a median follow up time of 14 months (range: 0 - 70). Indication was claudication (group 1, 47 %), critical limb ischaemia (group 2, 33 %) and acute limb ischaemia (group 3, 20 %). Technical success rate was 99.3 %, perioperative mortality 2 %. Primary, assisted-primary and secondary patency rates at one year were 60 %, 61 % and 64 %, respectively. Primary, primary assisted and secondary patency were lower in group 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (all p < 0.05). Results were better when endovascular repairs were performed above compared to below the open repair site (all p < 0.05). Limb salvage at 1 year in groups 1 - 3 were 98 %, 92 % and 90 %, respectively. The risk of major amputation was highest in group 3 compared to group 1 (p = 0.001) or group 2 (p < 0.04). Conclusions: The results depend on the type of ischaemia and the localization of endovascular procedures.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3