Disparities in the timing and measurement methods to assess vitamin D status during pregnancy: A Narrative Review

Abstract

Abstract. Studies that examined associations between low circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and adverse pregnancy outcomes used various designs, assay methods and time points for measurement of 25(OH)D concentrations, which creates some confusion in the current literature. We aimed to investigate the variability in the timing and measurement methods used to evaluate vitamin D status during pregnancy. Analysis of 198 studies published between 1976 and 2017 showed an important variability in the choice of 1) threshold values for 25(OH)D insufficiency or deficiency, 2) 25(OH)D measurement methods, and 3) trimester in which 25(OH)D concentrations were measured. Blood samples were taken once during pregnancy in a large majority of studies, which may not be representative of vitamin D status throughout pregnancy. Most studies reported adjustment for confounding factors including season of blood sampling, but very few studies used the 25(OH)D gold standard assay, the LC-MS/MS. Prospective studies assessing maternal 25(OH)D concentrations 1) by standardized and validated methods, 2) at various time points during pregnancy, and 3) after considering potential confounding factors, are needed.