Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures

Published:2024-02-16 Issue:1 Volume:27 Page:15-20
ISSN:1302-5805
Container-title:Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

BUYUKHATİPOGLU Işıl¹^ORCID,ÖZDEMİR Melek²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi

2. GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the satisfaction of the patients using the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) and VAS scale after 5-8 years of the treatment. Materials and Methods: A total of healthy 185 implants were selected according to the dental implant health scale accepted by International Congress of Oral Implantologists Consensus (ICOI) and 112 fixed implant- supported prosthesis evaluated for this study. The patient-reported effect was prospectively obtained by measuring oral health impact (OHIP-14) and VAS skale with a a follow-up period ranging from 5 to 8 years. Distribution of variables was checked using 0ne-Sample test. SPSS 22.0 programme was used for the analyses. Results: The patients were defined high satisfaction results after 5-8 years by implant placement. Mean VAS-score for the satisfaction percentage with implant-supported restorations was 87.80 % (SD ± 13.79). Mean OHIP score was 2.82 (SD ± 5.44). The results of OHIP 14 and VAS scores resulted that patient satisfaction with fixed implant supported prosthesis was high in all patients. Conclusions: The fixed implant-supported restorations served high satisfaction results according to the OHIP 14 and VAS results. These restorations has a positive effect to the quality of life for oral health (OHRQoL). Key Words: Quality of life; dental implant; denture ; partial; fixed

Publisher

Cumhuriyet University

Reference29 articles.

1. 1. Loza-Herrero MA, Rivas-Tumanyan S, Morou-Bermudez E. Success and complications of implant-retained prostheses provided by the post-doc- toral prosthodontics program, University of Puerto Rico: A cross-sectional study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(5):637–643.

2. 2. Gervais MJ, Wilson PR. A rationale for retrievability of fixed, implant-supported prostheses: a complication-based analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20(1):13-24.

3. 3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.

4. 4. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:517-521.

5. 5. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17(1):5-15.