Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Healing of Periapical Lesions Using MTA or Conventional Filling Materials: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Healing of Periapical Lesions Using MTA or Conventional Filling Materials: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Published:2024-02-16 Issue:1 Volume:27 Page:1-7
ISSN:1302-5805
Container-title:Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

SÜMBÜLLÜ Meltem¹^ORCID,DOĞANAY YILDIZ Ezgi²^ORCID,ÜNLÜ Mehmet Ali³^ORCID,ARSLAN Hakan⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ

2. bursa uludağ universitesi

3. rize dental and oral health hospital

4. İstanbul medeniyet üniversitesi

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the effect of MTA versus conventional filling materials on the healing of teeth with periapical lesions. Materials and methods Sixty-four teeth with periapical lesions of greater than 5 mm were divided into two groups; G1) MTA (ProRoot MTA; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) filling, G2) conventional filling materials (n = 32/group). In MTA group, the apical portion of the root canal was filled with ProRoot MTA and the middle and coronal thirds of the root canal were filled with injectable thermoplasticized gutta-percha system. Patients were followed for 15 months. The data were statistically analyzed with Mann-Whitney U and chi-square test (P = 0.05). Results With a follow-up rate of 89.06% of all patients for 15 months, favorable outcomes were obtained in 100% in ProRoot MTA and 83.3% in conventional technique. (P < 0.05). Conclusions ProRoot MTA showed better results compared to conventional filling materials in teeth with periapical radiolucency.

Publisher

Cumhuriyet University

Reference21 articles.

1. 1. Block RM, Bushell A, Rodrigues H, Langeland K. A histopathologic, histobacteriologic, and radiographic study of periapical endodontic surgical specimens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976;42(5):656-678.

2. 2. Weiner S, McKinney Jr RV, Walton RE. Characterization of the periapical surgical specimen: A morphologic and histochemical study of the inflammatory patterns. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53(3):293-302.

3. 3. Estrela C, Guedes OA, Rabelo LEG, Decurcio DA, Alencar AHG, Estrela CR, et al. Detection of apical inflammatory root resorption associated with periapical lesion using different methods. Braz Dental J 2014;25(5):404-408.

4. 4. Alsulaimani RS. Single-visit endodontic treatment of mature teeth with chronic apical abscesses using mineral trioxide aggregate cement: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2016;16(1):1-10.

5. 5. Salamat K, Rezai RF. Nonsurgical treatment of extraoral lesions caused by necrotic nonvital tooth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;61(6):618-623.