Bringing in the Experts: Library Research Guide Usability Testing in a Computer Science Class

Author:

Cobus-Kuo Laura,Gilmour Ron,Dickson Paul

Abstract

Objective – We sought to develop best practices for creating online research guides in an academic library. Methods – We performed usability tests of particular library research guides in order to determine how to improve them. Students in a Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) class (n=20) participated in the studies both as subjects of the tests and as evaluators of the results. The students were each interviewed and then asked to review the interviews recorded of four other classmates. Based on their own experience with the guides and their viewing of their classmates using the guides, the students worked with librarians to develop best practices. Results – Students were generally unfamiliar with the library's research guides prior to the study. They identified bibliographic databases as the most important links on the guides and felt that these should be prominently placed. Opinions about many specific features (e.g., images, length of guide, annotations) varied widely, but students felt strongly that there should be some organizational consistency among the guides. Conclusions – The importance that students placed on consistency led the library to adopt guidelines dictating the inclusion of a table of contents and short list of major databases at the top of each guide, as well as uniform placement of certain other elements.

Publisher

University of Alberta Libraries

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Improving LibGuides at a Health Sciences Library: A Case Study;Medical Reference Services Quarterly;2024-04-02

2. Evaluation and Creation of Web-based Resource Guides using SubjectsPlus;Journal of Information and Knowledge;2023-05-13

3. Testing for Transition;Information Technology and Libraries;2019-12-16

4. The Visual Effect: A Literature Review of Visual Design Principles as They Apply to Academic Library Websites;Internet Reference Services Quarterly;2018-10-02

5. Long Nav or Short Nav?: Student Responses to Two Different Navigational Interface Designs in LibGuides Version 2;The Journal of Academic Librarianship;2018-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3