Abstract
A Review of:
Hill, H., & Oswald, K. (2023). “May be a picture of a dog and a book”: The inaccessibility of public libraries’ social media feeds. Partnership, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v18i1.7008
Objective – The research project sought to explore how accessible the social media feeds of Ontario public libraries are, particularly the use of alt text for images, by assessing the usage of alt text and by making recommendations for appropriate use within social media posts.
Design – Collection of social media posts and computer-assisted textual analysis of visual media content.
Setting – 76 public libraries and 9 public library systems in Ontario, Canada.
Subjects – Approximately 900 Ontario public library social media posts from Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Methods – A random number generator sampling of 30 libraries per platform from the relevant social media accounts from a spreadsheet created using Ontario Public Library Statistics (OPLS) data of social media usage from the included libraries was initially created capturing 76 individual libraries. Then the researchers performed targeted sampling of posts from the nine library systems serving over 250,000 residents each. Researchers identified the 10 most recent posts from each included platform feed, and then undertook textual analysis for the presence of alt text with each post using two Mozilla Firefox browser extensions that determine the presence of alt text.
Main Results – Of the 76 unique libraries chosen by the random sampling and the nine library systems that serve populations over 250,000, only two regularly used alt text and five had at least one instance of alt text. Only Toronto Public Library regularly included alt text across each of the three social media platforms analyzed by the study. The study also initially aimed to assess the quality of alt text used by public libraries in social media posts. However, due to the lack of alt text use across the sample, this was not possible at the scale initially aimed for, although a small number of examples are analyzed in the findings.
Conclusion – The initial goal of analyzing the alt text to make recommendations for improved usage could not be realized due to the surprising lack of inclusion of any alt text across the sampled posts. This lack of any alt text can prevent some disabled users from engaging with content and information, leading to an inequitable experience. Public libraries should consider how accessible their engagement with users is and seek to improve the accessibility of social media posts.
Publisher
University of Alberta Libraries
Reference6 articles.
1. Brunskill, A., & Gilbert, E. (2023). Academic libraries’ social media posts related to disabilities: A review of libraries’ tweets in terms of their content and accessibility. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(3), Article 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102684
2. Gibson, A., Bowen, K., & Hanson, D. (2021, February 24). We need to talk about how we talk about disability: a critical quasi-systematic review. In The Library With The Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2021/disability/
3. Glynn, L. (2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610692154
4. Hill, H., & Oswald, K. (2023). “May be a picture of a dog and a book”: The inaccessibility of public libraries’ social media feeds. Partnership, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v18i1.7008
5. Koulouris, A., Vraimaki, E., & Koloniari, M. (2021). COVID-19 and library social media use. Reference Services Review, 49(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-06-2020-0044