Response to salinity of the submerged aquatic vegetation species \(\textit{Najas indica}\) (Willd.) Cham.
-
Published:2022-03-31
Issue:1
Volume:22
Page:29-35
-
ISSN:1859-3097
-
Container-title:Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:VJMST
Author:
Dang Xuan Thi Le,Phan Thi Thuy Hang,Ton That Phap,Hoang Cong Tin,Luong Quang Doc
Abstract
Najas indica (Willd.) Cham is known as a freshwater species of submerged aquatic vegetation. However, this species is widely distributed in both freshwater and brackish environments. This study examined the survival, growth rate and morphological performance of N. indica collected from the Cau Hai lagoon (Thua Thien Hue) against different salinity treatments in a mesocosm experiment to determine the optimal salinity for the species. The results showed significant effects of different salinities on survival rates, growth, biomass, and the morphological characteristics of N. indica. The species could survive and continue growing at 0–15 ppt but died completely at 20 ppt and 25 ppt after the first week of the 8-week experiment. Leaf length tended to be shorter in higher salinity. Shoot length, the number of internodes and branches per shoot, biomass reached the highest values at 5 ppt and 10 ppt. These suggested that the optimal salinity of the N. indica was at a range of 5–10 ppt. Study results were informative to explain the distribution change of the freshwater originated hydrophyte N. indica in lagoon environments in Vietnam.
Publisher
Publishing House for Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (Publications)
Reference18 articles.
1. [1] Carpenter, S. R., and Lodge, D. M., 1986. Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquatic botany, 26, 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(86)90031-8 2. [2] Short, F., Carruthers, T., Dennison, W., and Waycott, M., 2007. Global seagrass distribution and diversity: a bioregional model. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 350(1–2), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.06.012 3. [3] Lotze, H. K., Lenihan, H. S., Bourque, B. J., Bradbury, R. H., Cooke, R. G., Kay, M. C., Kidwell, S. M., Kirby, M. X., Peterson, C. H., and Jackson, J. B., 2006. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science, 312(5781), 1806–1809. doi: 10.1126/science.1128035 4. [4] Duarte, C. M., 2002. The future of seagrass meadows. Environmental conservation, 29(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000127 5. [5] Short, F. T., Koch, E. W., Creed, J. C., Magalhaes, K. M., Fernandez, E., and Gaeckle, J. L., 2006. SeagrassNet monitoring across the Americas: case studies of seagrass decline. Marine Ecology, 27(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2006.00095.x
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|