Evaluation of lightning warning technique with multi-source data for Vung Tau coastal area
-
Published:2023-06-09
Issue:2
Volume:23
Page:209-222
-
ISSN:1859-3097
-
Container-title:Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:VJMST
Author:
Hoang Hai Son,Nguyen Xuan Anh,Pham Xuan Thanh,Pham Le Khuong,Nguyen Hiep Van
Abstract
In this paper, the authors used multi-source data, including the electric field data observed by EFM-100C at Rescue Station No. 1 on the “Bai Sau” beach in Vung Tau coastal area for 166 days from May to October 2019; Himawari satellite data and Nha Be weather radar data and the GLD-360 lightning position data to evaluate the lightning warning method. Radar and satellite data were used to determine deep convective clouds. The GLD-360 lightning position data were used to examine the consistency of lightning location with the deep convective clouds. The “two areas” method was applied. The Area of Concern (AOC) has a radius of 10 km from the electric field measurement station. The Warning Area (WA) is 20 km extending from the outermost AOC area. Due to the influence of sea-salt aerosol on the background electric field intensity, the electric field threshold selected for a warning is larger than the absolute value (1.5 kV/m). The results showed that the probability of detection (POD), failure to warn (FTW), and false alarm ratio (FAR) were 86.3%, 13.07%, and 23.17%, respectively. The average time of lightning warning for the Vung Tau coastal area is 23 minutes in advance. The warning time is equivalent to that in some studies around the world. The value is suitable for practical application in lightning prevention on the beach and in the Vung Tau coastal area.
Publisher
Publishing House for Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (Publications)
Reference34 articles.
1. /[1] Kohn, M., Galanti, E., Price, C., Lagouvardos, K., and Kotroni, V., 2011. Nowcasting thunderstorms in the Mediterranean region using lightning data. Atmospheric Research, 100(4), 489–502. 2. /[2] Holle, R. L., Demetriades, N. W., and Nag, A., 2016. Objective airport warnings over small areas using NLDN cloud and cloud-to-ground lightning data. Weather and Forecasting, 31(4), 1061–1069. 3. /[3] Clulow, A. D., Strydom, S., Grant, B., Savage, M. J., and Everson, C. S., 2018. Integration of a ground-based lightning warning system into a mining operation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Weather, Climate, and Society, 10(4), 899–912. 4. /[4] Montanya, J., Bergas, J., and Hermoso, B., 2004. Electric field measurements at ground level as a basis for lightning hazard warning. Journal of Electrostatics, 60(2–4), 241–246. 5. /[5] Montanya, J., Aranguren, D., Pineda, N., Sola, G., Romero, D., and March, V., 2008. Total lightning, electrostatic field and meteorological radar applied to lightning hazard warning. In Proceedings of the 20th International Lightning Detection Conference.
|
|