Too much power or no power: when does intermediary’s power result into better wine and happier farmers?

Author:

Xhoxhi Orjon12,Imami Drini12,Hanf Jon3,Gjokaj Ekrem4

Affiliation:

1. Lecturer, Faculty of Economics and Agribusiness, Agricultural University of Tirana, 1025 Tirana, Albania.

2. Lecturer, Faculty of Tropical Agri Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague and CERGE EI, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.

3. Professor, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Von-Lade-Straβe 1, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany.

4. Lecturer, University ‘UKSHIN HOTI’ Prizren, Republic of Kosovo.

Abstract

The study analyzes the trading relationship performance between farmers and intermediaries and the factors shaping it, with a focus on intermediary’s power, based on a structured survey of vineyard farmers in Kosovo. Confirmatory factor analysis is employed to develop measures for the study latent variables, and ordinary least squares regression is used to test the hypothesis. To further validate the results, machine learning (i.e. random forest) is used to model the factors affecting the relationship performance between farmer and intermediary. The results show that when the intermediary has considerable (excessive) power, it leads to low trading relationship performance with farmers. Also, when the intermediary has little power, the relationship performance with farmers behaves in a similar way. The main contribution of this paper is to further illuminate the debate on the role of power in business-to-business relationships, in that it points out an alternative explanation; stating that there is an optimal level zone that power needs to exist, in order to achieve above average trading relationship performance. Outside this zone, either low or excessive/high intermediary’s power results in poor relationship performance.

Publisher

Wageningen Academic Publishers

Subject

General Medicine

Reference84 articles.

1. Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models

2. Ashenfelter, O. 2007. Predicting the quality and prices of Bordeaux wines. American Association of Wine Economists (AAWE) Working Paper No. 37297. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.37297

3. Power and Tactics in Bargaining

4. Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research

5. Beier, F.J. and L.W. Stern. 1969. Power in the distribution channel. Distribution channels: behavioral dimensions. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 92-116.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3