Do connectives improve the level of understandability in mathematical reality-based tasks?

Author:

Dammann Lena1ORCID,Heine Lena2ORCID,Leiss Dominik1ORCID,Ehmke Timo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leuphana University Lueneburg, Lüneburg, GERMANY

2. University of Bochum, Bochum, GERMANY

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that sentence-linking elements, like connectives, enhance text comprehension since they help produce a context of meaning. However, there is no evidence yet on whether connectives influence the understanding and solving of reality-based mathematical tasks. In this study, reality-based tasks were varied to create two versions with identical content, differing only in whether coherence relations were expressed explicitly by connectives or implicitly. The investigation aimed to determine if this variation affected students’ ability to comprehend the described situation and solve mathematical tasks based on the provided information. Initial results indicate that connectives do increase the rate of correct answers to comprehension questions, particularly for students with lower linguistic skills. Nevertheless, the use of connectives did not significantly influence mathematical task performance. This suggests that while connectives aid in understanding and organizing information, they may not contribute to students translating this advantage into improved mathematical task outcomes.

Publisher

Modestum Ltd

Reference37 articles.

1. Alhamdu, A. (2016). Interest and reading motivation. Psikis Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v1i1.552

2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., & Dai, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf

3. Becker, A. & Musan, R. (2014). Leseverstehen von Sachtexten: Wie Schüler Kohärenzrelationen erkennen [Reading comprehension of non-fiction texts: How students recognize coherence relations]. In M. Averintseva-Klisch, & C. Peschel (Eds.), Aspekte der Informationsstruktur für die Schule. Thema Sprache–Wissenschaft Für Den Unterricht 12 (pp. 129-155). Schneider Hohengehren.

4. Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 222-231). Horwood. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.5.221

5. Crible, L. (2021). Negation cancels discourse-level processing differences: Evidence from reading times in concession and result relations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(6), 1283-1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09802-2

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3