1. Akkoç, H., & Tall, D. (2005). A mismatch between curriculum design and student learning: the case of the function concept. In D. Hewitt & A. Noyes (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth British Congress of Mathematics Education held at the University of Warwick (pp. 1-8). Citeseer. http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/IPs/ip25-1/
2. Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48016-6
3. Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2004). Dialogic learning in collaborative investigation. Nordisk Matematikkdidaktikk [Nordic Mathematics Didactics], 9(2), 39-62.
4. Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29-40.
5. Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2016). Factors shaping students’ opportunities to engage in argumentative activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 575-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9584-3