Request Constructions in Classical Arabic versus Modern Arabic: A Corpus-based Study

Author:

Abbas Nawal FadhilORCID,Ali Qasim TabarekORCID,Jasim Haya Abdul-SalamORCID

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the various request constructions used in Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic language by identifying the differences in their usage in these two different genres. Also, the study attempts to trace the cases of felicitous and infelicitous requests in the Arabic language. Methodologically, the current study employs a web-based corpus tool (Sketch Engine) to analyze different corpora: the first one is Classical Arabic, represented by King Saud University Corpus of Classical Arabic, while the second is The Arabic Web Corpus “arTenTen” representing Modern Arabic. To do so, the study relies on felicity conditions to qualitatively interpret the quantitative data, i.e., following a mixed mode method. The findings of the present study show that request constructions vary in terms of occurrence between Classical Arabic and Modern Arabic. In Classical Arabic, (/laa/ لا) of prohibition is the most frequent construction, which is rarely used in the Web corpus where the command in the form of (/lam/لام + verb) is the most commonly emerging one, which is, in turn, seldom employed in the former corpus. The vocative (/ya/ يا) is the second most frequent construction in Classical Arabic, whilst the interrogative (/hel/ هل) emerged in the other genre. The third most common request construction is the interrogative (/hel/ هل) in Classical Arabic, but the vocative (/ya/ يا) is used in Modern Arabic. Nonetheless, some of these constructions fail to accomplish two or more conditions and hence are regarded as infelicitous requests. Such infelicitous constructions serve other functions than requests, such as negation, exclamation, and sarcasm.

Publisher

Modestum Ltd

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference49 articles.

1. Abbas, N. (2013). Positive politeness and social harmony in literary discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(3), 186–195.

2. Abu Musa, M. M. (1988). Rhetorics of Al-Quran and Zamakhshari explanation and its impact on rhetorical studies. Wahba publisher.

3. Al Dhulaee, M. (2011). Request mitigating devices in Australian English and Iraqi Arabic: A comparative study [Master’s thesis, Deakin University]. https://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30052041

4. Al Khasawneh, F. (2021). An analysis of mitigating devices of request used by Saudi EFL learner. International Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 3(11), 57–64.

5. Al-Darawish, H. A., & Al-Hayazi, M. (2005). The brevity in rhetorics (1st ed.). Dar Al-Fiker for publishing.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3