1. Arnaus, R. (1999). La formación del profesorado: Un encuentro comprometido con la complejidad educativa [Teacher training: A meeting committed to educational complexity]. In J. Angulo, J. Barquín, & A. Pérez (Eds.), Desarrollo profesional del docente: Política, investigación y práctica (pp. 599-635). Ediciones Akal.
2. Arzarello, F., & Sabena, C. (2011). Semiotic and theoretic control in argumentation and proof activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2-3), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9280-3
3. Ayalon, M., & Hershkowitz, R. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49(March 2018), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.010
4. Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. (2010). Generating conjectures in dynamic geometry: The maintaining dragging model. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(3), 225-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9169-3
5. Balacheff, N. (1999). Is argumentation an obstacle? Invitation to a debate. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, May/June. http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990506Theme/990506ThemeUK.html