Advances and trends in research on mathematical working spaces: A systematic review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Advances and trends in research on mathematical working spaces: A systematic review

Published:2024-06-01 Issue:6 Volume:20 Page:em2450
ISSN:1305-8215
Container-title:Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
language:
Short-container-title:EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed

Author:

Panqueban Darlis¹^ORCID,Henríquez-Rivas Carolina¹^ORCID,Kuzniak Alain²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, CHILE

2. UFR of Mathematics, André Revuz Didactic Laboratory, Université Paris Cité, Paris, FRANCE

Abstract

This study addresses the research developed around the theory of mathematical working spaces (MWS). To this end, factors such as researchers’ country of origin are considered, as well as methodological characteristics, proposed objectives in each study, specific theoretical factors, and the links between MWS and other theoretical perspectives. This systematic review follows the guidelines stated by reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for documenting each stage of the review. In total, 102 studies were considered from databases including Dialnet, SciElo, Scopus, and Web of Science. The results help to illustrate research trends in MWS theory, as well as the possibility of fertile ideas for new studies and future lines of research for those interested in this theoretical approach.

Publisher

Modestum Ltd

Link

https://www.ejmste.com/download/advances-and-trends-in-research-on-mathematical-working-spaces-a-systematic-review-14588.pdf

Reference47 articles.

1. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C., & Presmeg, N. (2015). Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Examples of methodology and methods. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6

2. Carrillo, J., Flores-Medrano, E., Contreras, L. C., & Climent, N. (2015). El profesor en el marco de los ETM el papel del MTSK como modelo de conocimiento [The teacher in the framework of the ETM the role of the MTSK as a model of knowledge]. In I. M. Gómez-Chacón, J. Escribano, A. Kuzniak, & P. R. Richard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th ETM Symposium (pp. 459-469). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

3. Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). A systematic literature review of the current discussion on mathematical modelling competencies: State-of-the-art developments in conceptualizing, measuring, and fostering. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 205-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10104-6

4. Coutat, S., & Richard, P. (2011). Les figures dynamiques dans un espace de travail mathématique pour l’apprentissage des propriétés géométriques [Dynamic figures in a mathematical workspace for learning geometric properties]. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives [Annals of Didactics and Cognitive Sciences], 16, 97-126.

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approches (6th Edn.). SAGE.