Intended mathematics curriculum in grade 1: A comparative study
-
Published:2023-03-01
Issue:3
Volume:19
Page:em2237
-
ISSN:1305-8215
-
Container-title:Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed
Author:
Borji Vahid1ORCID, Farsani Danyal2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC 2. Universidad Finis Terrae, Providencia, CHILE
Abstract
Learning mathematics in grade 1 as the formal starting point for learning mathematics in many countries can significantly impact students’ subsequent learnings. One of the most critical factors influencing teacher teaching and student learning is the written intended curriculum materials (official curricula). Despite the importance of this topic, there is little research on how many mathematics topics should be taught in grade 1 and to what depth students should learn these topics until the end of the first grade. In this study, we investigated and compared the grade 1 intended mathematics curriculum of Australia, Iran, Singapore, the Province of Ontario in Canada, and New York State in the USA. Indeed, we sought to examine how curriculum developers and decision-makers in education in these jurisdictions prepared the content of the first-grade mathematics in the curriculum writing materials. To do this, by examining the official curricula for grade 1 of these countries and using a procedure called general topic trace mapping, we found a list of 14 topics. The findings of the current paper showed similarities and differences in the topics intended in the mathematics curriculum of these countries. Ontario, Australia, Singapore, New York, and Iran curricula cover 13, 11, 9, 9, and 7 topics of 14 topics, respectively. We also considered five content strands and examined and compared the progress of each intended curriculum in these strands at the end of grade 1. We found that the learning progression in some content strands is different among countries. The results demonstrate the nuanced complexity of these comparisons and the importance of cross-national comparisons. We concluded this article with suggestions for curriculum developers, textbook writers, and teachers.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Education
Reference31 articles.
1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority. (2017). Student diversity. https://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/student-diversity 2. Bieda, K. N., Lane, J., Evert, K., Hu, S., Opperman, A., & Ellefson, N. (2020). A large-scale study of how districts’ curriculum policies and practices shape teachers’ mathematics lesson planning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 770-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1754921 3. Breda, A., Seckel, M. J., Farsani, D., Silva, J. F., & Calle, E. (2021). Teaching and learning of mathematics and criteria for its improvement from the perspective of future teachers: A view from the ontosemiotic approach. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(1), 31-51. 4. Brochu, P., Grady, K. O., Scerbina, T., Khan, G., & Muhe, N. (2017). TIMSS 2015: Canadian results from the trends in international mathematics and science study. http://www.cmec.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/373/TIMSS2015_Report_EN.pdf 5. Cai, J. (2014). Searching for evidence of curricular effect on the teaching and learning of mathematics: Some insights from the LieCal project. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 811-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0122-y
|
|