Affiliation:
1. The University of Southern Mississippi, USA
Abstract
<i>One of the major inefficiencies in qualitative research is the accuracy and timeliness of transcribing audio files into analyzable text. However, researchers may now have the ability to leverage artificial intelligence to increase research efficiency through Chat GPT. As a result, this study performs feasibility and accuracy testing of Chat GPT versus human transcription to compare accuracy and timeliness. Results suggest that by using specific commands, Chat GPT can clean interview transcriptions in seconds with a <1% word error rate and near 0% syntactic error rate. Implications for research and ethics are addressed.</i>
Reference16 articles.
1. Agomuoh, F., & Larsen, L. (2023, September 28). What is ChatGPT? Here’s how to use the AI chatbot everyone’s talking about. DigitalTrends. https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/how-to-use-openai-chatgpt-text-generation-chatbot/
2. Bock, K. (2011). “How much correction of syntactic errors are there, anyway?” Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(6), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00283.x
3. Campbell, J.C., Hindle, A., & Amaral, J.N. (2014). Syntax errors just aren't natural: Improving error reporting with language models. In Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2014). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597102
4. Crossley, S. A., Allen, D. B., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 84–101. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ926371
5. Hennessy, M., Dennehy, R., Doherty, J., & O’Donoghue, K. (2022). Outsourcing transcription: Extending ethical considerations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 32(7), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221101709
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献