What might be frequently overlooked is actually still beneficial: Learning from post national-standardized school examination

Author:

Rafi Ibnu1ORCID,Retnawati Heri1ORCID,Apino Ezi2ORCID,Hadiana Deni3ORCID,Lydiati Ida4ORCID,Rosyada Munaya Nikma1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Special Region of Yogyakarta, INDONESIA

2. Doctoral Program of Educational Research and Evaluation, Yogyakarta State University, Special Region of Yogyakarta, INDONESIA

3. Research Center for Education, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Special Capital Region of Jakarta, INDONESIA

4. SMA N 7 Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, INDONESIA

Abstract

This study describes the characteristics of the test and its items used in the national-standardized school examination by applying classical test theory and focusing on the item difficulty, item discrimination, test reliability, and distractor analysis. We analyzed response data of 191 12<sup>th</sup> graders from one of public senior high schools in Yogyakarta City, Indonesia, to the examination on the elective mathematics subject. The results showed that both multiple-choice and essay items contained in the test were at a moderate level of difficulty. The lowest item difficulty index went to the multiple-choice item where students failed in interpreting straight and dashed lines and went to the essay item that required complex intra-mathematical connections. In addition, we only found one item which was poor in distinguishing student competence. Furthermore, students’ test scores on multiple-choice and essay items were reliable. Although most multiple-choice items had at least two functioning distractors, it was still found two items whose all distractors were not functioning. In this article, we provide some suggestions concerning improvement towards mathematics learning practices.

Publisher

Modestum Ltd

Reference75 articles.

1. Abdel-Hameed, A. A., Al-Faris, E. A., Alorainy, I. A., & Al-Rukban, M. O. (2005). The criteria and analysis of good multiple choice questions in a health professional setting. Saudi Medical Journal, 26(10), 1505-1510.

2. Adegoke, B. A. (2013). Comparison of item statistics of physics achievement test using classical test and item response theory frameworks. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(22), 87-96.

3. Alcantara, E. C. (2015). On the derivation of some reduction formula through tabular integration by parts. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(1), 80-84.

4. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Brooks/Cole.

5. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3