Exploring epistemic agency in students’ problem-solving activities
-
Published:2023-02-18
Issue:1
Volume:19
Page:e2303
-
ISSN:2633-6537
-
Container-title:Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED
Author:
Akgun Mahir1ORCID, Sharma Priya2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. College of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 2. College of Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Abstract
This case study presents an exploration of epistemic agency in a middle school context. The main focus of this study was to identify and characterize the actions indicative of epistemic agency that emerged in student interactions. The study was conducted with sixth graders. Data were collected from multiple sources including records of student participation in the classroom and in the virtual space, student-created artifacts, and non-participant observations. A qualitative data analysis was conducted to identify actions indicative of epistemic agency. The findings showed that eleven actions emerged in students’ activities: generating new ideas, revising ideas, negotiating new ideas, sharing ideas, sharing data/information, drawing on other group’s ideas, drawing on other groups’ data/findings, collecting additional information, engaging in shared construction of data collection instruments, examining research data–seeking support for ideas, and creating a joint plan of actions. Future research identified by this study suggests further investigations of the interactional processes that may reveal key actions that trigger subsequent actions.
Subject
General Engineering,General Environmental Science,Education
Reference43 articles.
1. Alzen, J. L., Edwards, K., Penuel, W. R., Reiser, B. J., Passmore, C., Griesemer, C., Zivic, A., & Murzynski, C. (2020). Exploring the connections between epistemic agency and a commitment to the collective enterprise of sensemaking in the science classroom. In M. Gresalfi, & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences (pp. 1879-1886). International Society of the Learning Sciences. 2. Arvaja, M. (2010). Building understanding of the philosophy of science through immediate and mediated resources. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp. 27-34). University of Lancaster. 3. Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 663-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701582231 4. Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Kim, N. J., Jaden Turner, D., & Mark Weiss, D. (2019). Exploring epistemological approaches and beliefs of middle school students in problem-based learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(6), 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1650701 5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1992). Two models of classroom learning using a communal database. In S. Dijkstra, H. P. M. Krammer, & J. J. G. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Instructional models in computer-based learning environments (pp. 229-241). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02840-7_14
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|