Abstract
Objectives to study the effect of ACE and CIS sound coding strategies on sound perception in patients with the cochlear implants system produced by Cochlear Limited.
Material and methods. The study included 50 patients taking the rehabilitation course in the Astrakhan branch of the National Medical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology of the Federal Medico-Biological Agency over the past 5 years (from 2014 to 2019). The group of subjects included children over 7 years old and adults, whose success in rehabilitation made it possible to perform a full range of tests. The patients underwent tonal threshold audiometry and speech audiometry in a free sound field; the results obtained were registered in special MS Excel tables and further analysed using statistical methods.
Results. There were no statistically significant differences in hearing thresholds on tonal audiometry when using the coding strategies ACE and CIS, however, differences in speech perception were observed on average by 4.2%. The patients experienced in using hearing aids reported improved speech recognition, with scores varying within 5%.
Conclusion. Using a higher-resolution coding strategy can significantly improve speech recognition, while lower-resolution coding is beneficial for patients with digital hearing aid experience.
Publisher
FSBEI of Higher Education SamSMU of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Reference11 articles.
1. Djourno A, Eyries C, Vallancien B. De l’excitation e´lectrique du nerf cochle´airechez l’homme, par induction à distance, à l’aide d’un micro-bobinage inclus à demeure. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1957;151:423-425. (In French). [Djourno A, Eyries C, Vallancien B. Electric excitation of the cochlear nerve in man by induction at a distance with the aid of micro-coil included in the fixture. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1957;151:423-425. PMID: 13479991
2. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature. 1991;352:236-238. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1857418/ PMID: 1857418 https://doi.org/10.1038/352236a0
3. Moller AR. Cochlear and Brainstem Implants. Advances in Otorhinolaryngology. 2006;64:109-143. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094648
4. Kolokolov OV, Kuznecov AO, Machalov AS, Grigoreva AA. The history of the modernization of sound strategies of the system cochlear implantation. Health and Education millennium. 2018;20(12):82-86. (In Russ.). [Колоколов О.В., Кузнецов А.О., Мачалов А.С., Григорьева А.А. К вопросу истории модернизации стратегий кодирования звукового сигнала системами кохлеарной имплантации. Здоровье и образование в XXI веке. 2018;20(12):82-86]. https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2226-7425-2018-20-12-82-86
5. Vondrasek M, Sovka P, Tichy T. ACE Strategy with Virtual Channels. Radioengineering. 2008;17(4):55-61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26571432_ACE_Strategy_with_Virtual_Channels
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Features of cochlear implantation in older adults;Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine;2022-03-25