Mapping fault geomorphology with drone-based lidar
Author:
Salomon Guy,Finley Theron,Nissen Edwin,Stephen Roger,Menounos Brian
Abstract
The advent of sub-meter resolution topographic surveying has revolutionized active fault mapping. Light detection and ranging (lidar) collected using crewed airborne laser scanning (ALS) can provide ground coverage of entire fault systems but is expensive, while Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry from uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) is popular for mapping smaller sites but cannot image beneath vegetation. Here, we present a new UAV laser scanning (ULS) system which overcomes these limitations to survey fault-related topography cost-effectively, at desirable spatial resolutions, and even beneath dense vegetation. In describing our system, data acquisition and processing workflows, we provide a practical guide for other researchers interested in developing their own ULS capabilities. We showcase ULS data collected over faults from a variety of terrain and vegetation types across the Canadian Cordillera and compare them to conventional ALS and SfM data. Due to the lower, slower UAV flights, ULS offers improved ground return density (~260 points/m2 for the capture of a paleoseismic trenching site and ~10–72 points/m2 for larger, multi-kilometer fault surveys) over conventional ALS (~3–9 points/m2) as well as better vegetation penetration than both ALS and SfM. The resulting ~20–50 cm-resolution ULS terrain models reveal fine-scale tectonic landforms that would otherwise be challenging to image.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Canada Foundation for Innovation University of Victoria Canada Research Chairs Gouvernement du Yukon British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund
Publisher
McGill University Library and Archives
Reference128 articles.
1. Arrowsmith, J. R., Rhodes, D. D., & Pollard, D. D. (1998). Morphologic dating of scarps formed by repeated slip events along the San Andreas Fault, Carrizo Plain, California. Journal of Geophysical Research (Solid Earth), 103(B5), 10,141-10,160. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JB00505 2. Baldwin, K., Allen, L., Basquill, S., Chapman, K., Downing, D., Flynn, N., MacKenzie, W., Major, M., Meades, W., Meidinger, D., Morneau, C., Saucier, J.-P., Thorpe, J., & Uhlig, P. (2019). Vegetation Zones of Canada: A Biogeoclimate Perspective. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service. 3. Bemis, S. P., Micklethwaite, S., Turner, D., James, M. R., Akciz, S., Thiele, S. T., & Bangash, H. A. (2014). Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry: A multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology. Journal of Structural Geology, 69, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007 4. Benavente, C., Wimpenny, S., Rosell, L., Robert, X., Palomino, A., Audin, L., Aguirre, E., & Garcı́a, B. (2021). Paleoseismic Evidence of an Mw 7 Pre-Hispanic Earthquake in the Peruvian Forearc. Tectonics, 40(6), e2020TC006479. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006479 5. Bender, A. M., & Haeussler, P. J. (2017). Eastern Denali Fault surface trace map, eastern Alaska and Yukon, Canada (USGS Numbered Series No. 2017–1049; p. 13). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171049
|
|