Author:
Ahmed Ali Mohamed Abdelhamid,Mostafa Diana
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guided bone regeneration and guided tissue regeneration procedures have been performed using barrier membranes in clinical dentistry to enhance bone formation in osseous defects, ridge preservation and reconstruction. Despite the considerable number of new biomaterials that develop with more advantages and fewer disadvantages for bone regeneration, the cost and surgical approach difficulties are still the main obstacles that we tried to overcome using the novel membrane.
AIM: Our research aimed to assess histologically the bone formation using the novel membrane in experimental bone defects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study was conducted on ten mongrel dogs. Each animal presented two groups. The first group was at the left side of the animal mandible which received Bio-Oss only while the right side received Bio-Oss and was covered by the novel non-resorbable membrane. These dogs were sacrificed (3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks) postoperatively for histological assessment of healing and bone formation of osseous defects.
RESULTS: The histological evaluation showed that the formation of new bone in group I (Bio-OSS only) was less in amount as compared with group II (Bio-Oss with the novel non-resorbable membrane).
CONCLUSION: The present clinical findings revealed that the novel non-resorbable membrane was inert and induced no inflammatory reaction or graft rejection. The study provided histological evidence of new bone formation in close contact with host bone due to osteoconductivity of Bio-Oss and cell occlussiveness of the membrane.
Publisher
Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI
Reference25 articles.
1. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Rylander H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1982;9(4):290-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1982.tb02095.x PMid:6964676
2. Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Linde A, Nyman S. Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4(1):19-25. PMid:2599578
3. Buser D, Dula K, Belser U, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1993;13(1):29-45. PMid:8330945
4. Brownfield LA, Weltman RL. Ridge preservation with or without an osteoinductive allograft: A clinical radiographic micro-computed tomography, and histologic study evaluating dimensional changes and new bone formation of the alveolar ridge. J Periodontol. 2012;83(5):581-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110365 PMid:21942791
5. El Askary AE. Fundamentals of esthetic implant dentistry. In: Immediate Esthetic Implant Therapy. 2nd ed., Ch. 6. Munksgaard: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2007. p. 179-207.