Abstract
BACKGROUND: An accurate diagnosis is essential for the effective treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) and for the patients’ well-being.
AIM: Thе main purpose of this study was to assess the utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) for initial detection of PCa among the Bulgarian population of men with prostate diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients, aged 44 to 82 years, were evaluated for clinically significant PCa. Assessment methods included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels, transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), GE Discovery 3T MRI, and 12-core TRUS biopsy.
RESULTS: mp-MRI showed 83.20% concordance with TRUS biopsy: sensitivity of 91.43% (76.90–98.20), specificity of 75.00% (34.90–96.80), positive predictive values 94.10% (82.80–98.20) and negative predictive values 66.70% (38.70–86.40). Of the patients classified in prostate imaging–reporting and data system (PI-RADS) levels 4 and 5, 94.12% had positive TRUS biopsy, as well as 44.40% of PI-RADS had level 3. Irrespective of the patients’ age and PSA, PI-RADS was found to be a significant predictor of a positive TRUS biopsy (p = 0.009). PSA serum levels showed a low concordance with TRUS biopsy (area under the curve = 0.539; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.363–0.712) and a low, although significant, correlation with PI-RADS (rs = 0.416; 95% CI: 0.164–0.617).
CONCLUSION: According to our findings, mp-MRI and TRUS biopsy have a high level of concordance for the initial detection of PCa. The incorporation of mp-MRI into the diagnostic pathway for PCa can significantly reduce the number of incorrect diagnoses based on PSA serum levels and/or suspicious physical and digital examinations.
Publisher
Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI
Reference17 articles.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 PMid:30207593
2. Ferlay JE, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Pineros M, Znaor A, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Tomorrow. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow. [Last accessed on 2022 Apr 10].
3. Ito K. Advancements in PSA-based screening for prostate cancer. Rinsho Byori. 2004;52(7):611-7. PMid:15344561
4. Song JM, Kim CB, Chung HC, Kane RL. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: A meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic Korean men. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46(3):414-24. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2005.46.3.414 PMid:15988815
5. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65(1):124-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046 PMid:24207135
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献