Studying the Opinions of Medical Workers about Preconception Care

Author:

Podilyakina YuliyaORCID,Kulov Dusentay,Amirbekova Zhanna,Stundžienė Rasa,Drobchenko Elena,Abugalieva Tleuzhan

Abstract

Abstract. Objective: to study the opinion of medical personnel (doctors and nurses) on the methods of preconception care and measures to improve the provision of medical care before conception in Kazakhstan (Karaganda region). Design: The data obtained during the study were subjected to statistical processing by the method of variation statistics using the free version of the EPI InfoTM program. The arithmetic mean (M) and standard deviation (±SD) were calculated for quantitative indicators, the data were presented as M±SD. The Krusk-Wallis test (H test) was used to compare means. Absolute (n) and relative (%) values ​​describe qualitative variables. χ2 were used to compare frequencies and qualitative variables. The critical significance level (p) when testing statistical hypotheses was taken as 0.05. Conditions: In the Karaganda region, a survey was conducted among doctors of the specialty general practitioner, general practitioner/family doctor, obstetrician-gynecologist and nursing staff. The survey was aimed at identifying the knowledge of health professionals about preconception care and at identifying barriers and factors preventing preconception care. Participants: 365 doctors and 375 nurses/midwives took part in the survey. Results: medical staff were asked to fill out a questionnaire, which addressed issues related to the ways of providing PC, barriers to the implementation of PC. 40% (n=292) of respondents noted that preconception care should be carried out by specialists from the family planning office. 24.3% (n=180) do not conduct conversations on preconception care due to lack of time, knowledge, a clear algorithm for conducting PC, and because they do not consider it their functional duty. Measures were proposed to improve the level of provision of preconception training in the Republic of Kazakhstan.    

Publisher

Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3