Author:
Zarzora Ahmed,Foda Manal Yehia,El Dawlatly Mostafa Mohamed,Dehis Heba Mohamed
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the incidence of impacted mandibular third molar in different anteroposterior and vertical facial skeletal patterns and to evaluate the angle of impaction of mandibular third molar.
Methodology: 207 Panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs for patients above 20 years old with impacted mandibular third molar were recruited from the orthodontic department clinics in multiple universities in Egypt and traced using WebCeph ™ software. From the lateral cephalograms, three anteroposterior measurements were taken which were termed as ANB, A-B difference and Wits appraisal and three vertical angles were measured which were SN/MP, MMPA and FMPA to determine different skeletal facial types. The angulation of mandibular third molar impaction was determined by β angle according to Winter’s classification from the orthopantomogram.
Results: Among all 207 analyzed cases, impacted third molars were detected in (38.6%) cases
unilaterally and (61.4%) bilaterally. Anteroposteriorly, the higher percentage of total impactions was found in subjects with a class 2 skeletal pattern (97.2%). Vertically, the higher percentage of total impactions was found in subjects with a mesocephalic facial pattern (45.9%). The most common type of impaction was mesioangular based on Winter’s classification.
Conclusions: A higher incidence of lower third molar impaction was found in subjects with a class 2 skeletal pattern. A higher incidence of lower third molar impaction was found in subjects with a mesocephalic facial pattern. In almost all skeletal facial types, the mesioangular position of the impacted mandibular third molar was the most prevalent position.
Publisher
Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI
Reference32 articles.
1. Brakus I, Filipovic Zore I, Boric R, Siber S, Svegar D, Kuna T. Analysis of impacted and retained teeth operated at Department of oral surgery, school of dental medicine, Zagreb. Coll Antropol. 2010;34 Suppl 1:229-33. PMid:20402324
2. Santosh P. Impacted mandibular third molars: Review of literature and a proposal of a combined clinical and radiological classification. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5(4):229-34. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.160177 PMid:26229709
3. Bishara SE, Andreasen G. Third molars: A review. Am J Orthod. 1983;83(2):131-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9416(83)90298-1 PMid:6572040
4. Bishara SE. Third molars: A dilemma! Or is it? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999;115(6)628-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70287-8 PMid:10358244
5. Shokri A, Mahmoudzadeh M, Baharvand M, Mortazavi H, Faradmal J, Khajeh S, et al. Position of impacted mandibular third molar in different skeletal facial types: First radiographic evaluation in a group of Iranian patients. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(1):61-5. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.61 PMid:24701460