Parkinson’s Disease Inequities in Daily Cognitive Activities: An Intersectional Approach

Author:

Adkins-Jackson Paris B.1,Taikeff Nicole2,Akingbulu Josephine3,Avila-Rieger Justina F.4,Corona-Long Caitlin A.5

Affiliation:

1. 1 Departments of Epidemiology and Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY

2. 2 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

3. 3 School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA

4. 4 Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center and Institute for Research in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease, Columbia University, New York, NY

5. 5 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Abstract

Objective Intersectionality approaches to examining differences in Parkinson’s disease (PD) based on racialized group, gender identity, and socioeconomic status (SES) are not well covered in the literature. Additionally, the differences in daily cognitive activities for persons diagnosed with PD by racialized group, gender, and SES are undetermined. This study was conducted to explore the differences in PD daily cognitive activities for diverse racialized groups by gender and SES. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of the Michael J. Fox Foundation’s Fox Insight online clinical dataset. Persons with PD were partitioned into 16 racialized by gender groups (Black women, Indigenous men, Latina/x women, Asian men, etc.) that were used in within-group comparisons of low-, middle-, and high-SES—a new variable comprising education and income. Results Intersectional analyses revealed most items differed between low-SES and high-SES except for items associated with Black and Indigenous men, for whom significant differential item functioning was found between mid-SES and high-SES. Conclusions These findings revealed that within-group differences exist and may be missed in research in which social factors are adjusted for instead of included in the model.

Publisher

Ethnicity and Disease Inc

Reference51 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3