Primary School Children’s Nutrition Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Behavior, after a Three-Year Healthy Lifestyle Intervention (HealthKick)

Abstract

<strong>Objectives</strong>: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of HealthKick(HK), a healthy lifestyle intervention, on nutrition knowledge, behavior, and dietary selfefficacy of school children in the Western Cape Province of South Africa.<br />Design: A three-year cluster randomized control trial at primary schools in low socioeconomic settings with a baseline study in 2009 and follow-up in 2010 and 2011.<br /><strong>Participants:</strong> Participants were Grade four children (n=500) at eight schools in the intervention group and at eight schools in the control group (n=498).<br /><strong>Methods:</strong> An action planning process was followed with educators whereby they identified their own school health priorities and ways to address them. Schools were provided with nutrition resources, including curriculum guidelines and the South African food-based dietary guidelines. Children completed a questionnaire comprising nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy and behavioral items.<br /><strong>Results</strong>: The intervention significantly improved the knowledge of the intervention group at the first (mean difference =1.88, 95%CI: .32 to 3.43, P=.021) and second follow-up (mean difference=1.92, 95%CI:<br />.24 to 3.60, P=.031) compared with the control group. The intervention effect for self-efficacy was not significant at the first follow-up (mean difference=.32, 95%CI: -.029 to .94, P=.281) whereas a significant<br />effect was observed at the second followup (mean difference=.71, 95%CI: .04 to 1.38, P=.039). There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups for nutritional behavior scores at any of the follow-up time points.<br /><strong>Conclusion</strong>: The HK intervention improved nutrition knowledge and  self-efficacy significantly in primary schoolchildren; however, it did not improve their eating behavior. <em>Ethn Dis.</em> 2016;26(2):171-180;<br />doi:10.18865/ed.26.2.171<strong></strong>