Exploring the Social Reinforcing Value of Brushing in Equine-Assisted Services: A Comparative Study with Food Reinforcement

Author:

Schroeder Katy12,Arant Megan34,Hekkert Cameron56,Protopopova Alexandra3

Affiliation:

1. Correspondence: Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, USA

2. Department of Counselor Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

3. Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

4. Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha, Waukesha, WI, USA

5. Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

6. Texas Tech University School of Law, Lubbock, TX, USA

Abstract

Abstract Brushing is one of the most common human-horse interactions in Equine-Assisted Services (EAS). Previous research has shown both positive and negative effects of brushing on horses’ behavior and physiological states. One of the primary reasons horses are included in services such as mental and behavioral healthcare is to provide human clients with positive relational experiences; however, more empirical research is needed to determine if horses also receive socially derived benefits from their interactions with human clients. Therefore, we set out to determine whether brushing can function as a social reinforcer for horses utilized in EAS in comparison to food reinforcement. Six EAS horses from a university-based Premier Accredited Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship, International center in the Southwestern Region of the United States participated in a single-subject reversal ABCABC design experiment, in which stimuli (A: Brushing, B: Food, and C: Control [Extinction]) were provided contingent on an arbitrary behavior (nose touch to the experimenter’s closed fist). All horses exhibited maximal or near-maximal responding in the food condition, but low responding in the brushing and control conditions. Data indicated that brushing was not an effective reinforcer for horses compared to food, and this could suggest brushing is a low-value reinforcer. Alternatively, it is possible to access to food at relatively short intervals in time during the experiment may have impacted the reinforcing value of brushing. Human-animal interaction proponents are increasingly calling attention to the need to ensure that equine-inclusive healthcare services address horse welfare, including the promotion of positive welfare experiences. Results from this study support the need for more research on identifying optimal interactions that can promote mutual benefits to both humans and horses participating in EAS.

Publisher

CABI Publishing

Reference36 articles.

1. Physiological and behavioral benefits for people and horses during guided interactions at an assisted living residence;Baldwin A.L.;Behavioral Sciences,2021

2. Equine Behavioral Medicine

3. Horse Behavior towards Familiar and Unfamiliar Humans: Implications for Equine-Assisted Services

4. Ekholm Fry, N. (2019) Horses in the treatment of trauma. In: Tedeschi, P. and Jenkins, M. (eds) Transforming Trauma: Finding Resiliency and Healing Through Animals. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN, pp. 265–298.

5. Welfare Considerations for Horses in Therapy and Education Services

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Equine Welfare in Therapy and Learning Services;Animal-assisted Interventions;2023-12-19

2. Behavioural Issues in Horses Working in Human Mental Healthcare Services;Animal Behaviour and Welfare Cases;2023-11-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3