An integrated inventory of One Health tools: Mapping and analysis of globally available tools to advance One Health-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An integrated inventory of One Health tools: Mapping and analysis of globally available tools to advance One Health

Published:2024-06-22 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2791-223X
Container-title:CABI One Health
language:en
Short-container-title:CABI One Health

Author:

Behravesh Casey Barton¹^ORCID,Charron Dominique F.²³^ORCID,Liew Amanda¹^ORCID,Becerra Natalia Cediel⁴^ORCID,Machalaba Catherine⁵^ORCID,Hayman David T.S.⁶^ORCID,Ciacci Zanella Janice R.⁷^ORCID,Farag Elmoubasher⁸^ORCID,Chaudhary Abhishek⁹^ORCID,Belles Hayley¹^ORCID,Adisasmito Wiku B.¹⁰^ORCID,Almuhairi Salama¹¹^ORCID,Bilivogui Pépé¹²^ORCID,Bukachi Salome A.¹³^ORCID,Casas Natalia¹⁴^ORCID,Cunningham Andrew A.¹⁵^ORCID,Debnath Nitish¹⁶¹⁷^ORCID,Dar Osman¹⁸¹⁹^ORCID,Dungu Baptiste²⁰²¹^ORCID,Gao George F.²²^ORCID,Khaitsa Margaret²³^ORCID,Koopmans Marion P.G.²⁴^ORCID,Mackenzie John S.²⁵^ORCID,Morand Serge²⁶²⁷^ORCID,Smolenskiy Vyacheslav²⁸^ORCID,Zhou Lei²⁹^ORCID,Markotter Wanda³⁰^ORCID,Mettenleiter Thomas C.³¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America;

2. Visiting Scholar, One Health Institute, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada;

3. DFGC Health and Environment, Ltd, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada;

4. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia;

5. EcoHealth Alliance, New York, United States of America;

6. Molecular Epidemiology and Public Health Laboratory, Hopkirk Research Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand;

7. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Embrapa Swine and Poultry, Concórdia, Santa Catarina, Brazil;

8. Ministry of Public Health, Health Protection & Communicable Diseases Division, Doha, Qatar;

9. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India;

10. Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia;

11. National Emergency Crisis and Disasters Management Authority, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;

12. World Health Organization, Guinea Country Office, Conakry, Guinea;

13. Institute of Anthropology, Gender and African Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya;

14. National Ministry of Health, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina;

15. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom;

16. Fleming Fund Country Grant to Bangladesh, DAI Global, Dhaka, Bangladesh;

17. One Health Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh;

18. Global Operations Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom;

19. Global Health Programme, Chatham House, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, United Kingdom;

20. Bonisa Solutions, Pretoria, South Africa;

21. Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic Congo;

22. Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;

23. Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, United States of America;

24. Erasmus MC, Department of Viroscience, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

25. Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia;

26. HealthDEEP, CNRS Institut Ecologie Environnement, Paris, France;

27. Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand;

28. Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-being (Rospotrebnadzor), Moscow, Russian Federation;

29. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China;

30. Centre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;

31. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany

Abstract

Abstract The global demand from multi-sectoral partners for operational tools for One Health implementation and capacity building is increasing, yet a validated global inventory of One Health tools did not exist. Here, we map and analyze available One Health tools and assess their suitability to support One Health implementation, including the One Health Joint Plan of Action 2022–2026 (OH JPA). Our objectives were to identify (i) publicly available One Health tools to support capacity building and OH JPA implementation; (ii) optimal outcomes for countries/regions using available One Health tools; (iii) linkages to OH JPA Action Tracks and pathways in the One Health Theory of Change (TOC); and (iv) gaps and priorities for the development of additional One Health tools. One Health High Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) members compiled information on One Health tools that were publicly available and released up to June 30, 2023, via online sources and partner networks including the Quadripartite organizations. Inclusion criteria addressed One Health relevance, use at the national, subnational, or regional level in ≥5 locations, and publicly available information. Tools were assessed for applicability by OH JPA action track, TOC pathway, scope, and intended outcomes, as well as the extent to which tools addressed gender equality, social inclusion, and environmental dimensions of One Health. Of 132 candidate tools, 50 (38%) met the inclusion criteria. These tools addressed all six OH JPA Action Tracks, but relatively fewer tools addressed Action Tracks 4 (Food Safety), 5 (Antimicrobial Resistance), and 6 (Environmental Integration). Tools were available to support all three TOC outcome pathways, and many addressed more than one Action Track and TOC outcome pathway. Most available One Health tools addressed assessment and to a lesser extent implementation, with fewer tools available for action planning, prioritization, and monitoring. Gaps and opportunities for improving One Health tools were identified, including the integration of the environment dimension, gender equality, and social inclusion. Ultimately, our findings will contribute to further the advancement of One Health globally, including via OH JPA implementation, while spurring adjustments to existing One Health tools and the development of new ones to address key gaps. One Health impact statement The One Health approach is gaining momentum globally, and this study represents the first integrated mapping and analysis of globally available One Health tools. Our findings aim to improve the quality, applicability, and availability of tools to support One Health implementation at the subnational, national, regional, and global levels, including through the Quadripartite’s One Health Joint Plan of Action. By using the OHHLEP definition of One Health to assess available One Health tools and map them onto the One Health Joint Plan of Action, we identify the need for a systematic approach and enhanced integration across dimensions of One Health to lead to sustainable One Health systems.

Publisher

CABI Publishing

Reference111 articles.

1. APHL and CDC (2013) Laboratory efficiencies initiative: Informatics self-assessment tool for public health laboratories. APHL. Available at: https://www.aphl.org/programs/informatics/Documents/LEI_2013Jun_Informatics-Self-Assessment-Tool-for-PHLs.pdf.

2. Berthe F.C.J. Bouley T. Karesh W.B. LeGall F.G. Machalaba C.C. Plante C.A. and Seifman R.M. (2018) Operational Framework for Strengthening Human Animal and Environmental Public Health Systems at Their Interface (English) (WorldBankGroup Ed.). Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/703711517234402168/Operational-framework-for-strengthening-human-animal-and-environmental-public-health-systems-at-their-interface.

3. Evaluation of Collaboration in a Multisectoral Surveillance System: The ECoSur Tool

4. Evaluation of the economic impact of classical and African swine fever epidemics using OutCosT, a new spreadsheet‐based tool

5. CDC (2021) Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/fetp/index.htm (accessed 12 February 2024).