The State of Assessment in Human-Animal Interaction Research

Author:

Rodriguez Kerri E.1,Guérin Noémie A.1,Gabriels Robin L.2,Serpell James A.3,Schreiner Pamela J.4,O’Haire Marguerite E.1

Affiliation:

1. Center for the Human-Animal Bond, Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, IN, USA

2. Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA

3. Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society, Department of Clinical Sciences & Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, PA, USA

4. Center to Study Human-Animal Relationships and Environments, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, MN, USA

Abstract

AbstractThere is a growing body of research in human-animal interaction (HAI), but the field is often criticized for its lack of methodological rigor and heterogeneous outcome assessment. In addition, there is a scarcity of valid and reliable assessment tools specific to measuring constructs directly related to HAI. As the field continues to develop, there is a critical need for the consistent use of standardized, well-validated, and appropriate assessment tools. The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of the state of assessment in HAI while identifying current needs for method standardization, development, or refinement. Specifically, we review in detail the use of (1) questionnaires, (2) physiological measures, and (3) behavior assessment tools in the field of HAI while offering examples of successful application, describing methodological limitations, and providing recommendations for use in HAI research.

Publisher

CABI Publishing

Reference120 articles.

1. Infant–mother attachment.

2. A comparative study of the temporal patterns of cutaneous water vapour loss from some domesticated mammals with epitrichial sweat glands

3. Aman M. G. Burrow W. H. & Wolford P. L. (1995). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community: Factor validity and effect of subject variables for adults in group homes. American Journal on Mental Retardation.

4. The Alone Rangers and Silver

5. Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3