COMPARISON OF SKIMMILK FAT TESTS AND NEW VERMONT METHOD1,2

Author:

Duthie A. H.1,Foulkes P. H.1,Atherton H. V.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Vermont, Burlington 05401

Abstract

A comparative study of skimmilk fat tests indicated the need for a more accurate method. Such a method was developed at the Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station. Called the Vermont method, this uses Patton's aqueous reagent of n-butylamine and n-butanol, Babcock equipment and glassware, and the TeSa water bath. This Vermont method is simple, inexpensive, and no more time cousuming than the Babcock procedure. Twenty-two trials were performed whereby skimmilk samples were collected weekly from 6 milk dealers and tested by 5 or 6 methods. Several milk dealers sold skimmilk that consistently tested higher than 0.50% fat as determined by the Mojonnier procedure. It was apparent that results obtained with the Babcock, Wildasin Babcock (use of a quaternary ammonium compound), and American Association (modified Babcock using n-butanol) methods showed poor fat percentage agreement over the legal fat range, compared with the Mojonnier procedure. Data from the Gerber and Vermont methods showed very close agreement with that of the Mojonnier procedure. Statistical analysis indicated a significant difference (P < 0.01) between fat percentages obtained using the Babcock, Wildasin Babcock, and American Association methods when compared with the Mojonnier technique. Results from the Gerber and Vermont methods were not significantly different from those obtained with the Mojonnier procedure. Precision for the Vermont method was determined by testing 10 replicate samples of 2. different skimmilks. The means and standard deviations for the samples are as follows: 0.12.% ± 0.005, and 0.44% ± 0.007. Use of the Vermont method must await results of studies from other laboratories.

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3