Affiliation:
1. Meat Technology Center - CTC, Institute of Food Technology, Avenida Brasil 2880, CEP 13070-178, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
2. Merck S. A. Brazil, Alameda Xingu 350, 7° andar, CEP 06455-030, Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Healthy cattle are considered the main reservoir of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains, so in some places in the world, products derived from beef are the most common source for disease outbreaks caused by these bacteria. Therefore, to guarantee that the beef produced by our slaughterhouses is safe, there is a need for continuous monitoring of these bacteria. In this study, 215 beef cuts were evaluated, including chilled vacuum-packed striploins (151 samples), rib eyes (30 samples), and knuckles (34 samples), from March to June 2018. These meat samples were collected from the slaughter of unconfined cattle, being arbitrarily collected from eight meat processing companies in São Paulo state, Brazil. Each sample was examined for the presence of STEC toxin type (stx1 and/or stx2 genes) and also the attaching and effacing E. coli (eae) gene, determined by a multiplex PCR assay. We show that the major seven STEC strains (O serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157) are not detected in any of the analyzed beef cut samples; however, three of them presented the virulence eae gene. Therefore, the absence of STEC strains in the beef samples may be an indication of the low prevalence of this pathogen in the cattle herd on the farm, associated with good hygiene and handling practices adopted by the meat industry.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference41 articles.
1. Albert,
M. J.,
Faruque.
S. M.,
Ansaruzzaman
M.,
Islam
M. M.,
Haider
K.,
Alam
K.,
Kabir R.
I.,
and
Robins-BrowneR.
1992.
Sharing of virulence-associated properties at the phenotypic and genetic levels between enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Hafnia alvei.
J. Med. Microbiol.
37:
310–
314.
2. Andreoli,
S.,
Trachtman
H.,
Acheson
D. W. K.,
Siegler
R. L.,
and
ObrigT. G.
2002.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapy.
Pediatr. Nephrol.
17:
293–
298.
3. Armstrong,
G. L.,
Hollingsworth
J.,
and
MorrisJ. G.
1996.
Emerging foodborne pathogens: Escherichia coli O157:H7 as a model of entry of a new pathogen into the food supply of the developed world.
Epidemiol. Rev.
18:
29–
51.
4. Australian Department of Agriculture and Water Resources.
2017.
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in manufacturing beef: where have we been? Where should we be going?Available at: https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/research-and-development/program-areas/food-safety/pdfs/seminar-final-report.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2021.
5. Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento.
2015.
Aprova os procedimentos para a coleta e análise de Escherichia coli verotoxigênica e Salmonella spp. em carne de bovino in natura utilizada na formulação de produtos cárneos, cominutados, prontos para serem cozidos, fritos ou assados.
Diário Oficial da União,
Brasília, DF.
Available at: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/inspecao/produtos-animal/controle-de-patogenos/escherichia-coli. Accessed 10 August 2021.