Evaluation of invA Diversity among Salmonella Species Suggests Why Some Commercially Available Rapid Detection Kits May Fail To Detect Multiple Salmonella Subspecies and Species

Author:

BUEHLER ARIEL J.1,WIEDMANN MARTIN1,KASSAIFY ZEINA2,CHENG RACHEL A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-7011 [R.A.C.])

2. Mars, Inc., 6885 Elm Street, McLean, Virginia 22101, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTinvA is a common molecular target for Salmonella-specific detection methods and is recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual as a target for PCR confirmation of putative Salmonella isolates. Novel assays designed for the rapid detection of foodborne pathogens are often validated according to guidelines provided by validation schemes, such as the AOAC International or the International Organization for Standardization. However, these validation guidelines allow for flexibility in the validation study experimental design, which may inflate the assay's ability to detect foodborne pathogens, especially for foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella, exhibiting tremendous species diversity with >2,600 confirmed serovars. This study was conducted to (i) describe the sequence diversity of invA, across a diverse set of Salmonella serovars and (ii) evaluate the ability of two commercially available, AOAC International–validated rapid detection assays to detect a diverse collection of Salmonella spp. strains. In silico analyses identified 362 of 2,058 nucleotide sites that were variable among invA sequences from a diverse collection, representing 86 unique serovars spanning all species and subspecies. Not surprisingly, the majority of variable sites (308 of 2,058) occurred in non–Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica strains, including Salmonella bongori and the other S. enterica subspecies. In vitro testing showed that both rapid detection assays, examined here, failed to detect all Salmonella strains at 1 log above the limit of detection, with assay A failing to detect S. enterica subsp. salamae, and assay B failing to detect S. bongori. Both strains were eventually detected at 100,000 times the limit of detection. Taken together, our study highlights the need to include non–subsp. S. enterica strains in the development and validation of rapid detection methods to limit false-negative test results.HIGHLIGHTS

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

Reference34 articles.

1. Salmonella, chap. 5;Andrews;Bacteriological analytical manual,2007

2. AOAC International. 2012. Methods Committee guidelines for validation of microbiological methods for food and environmental surfaces. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD. Available at: http://www.aoac.org/aoac_prod_imis/AOAC_Docs/StandardsDevelopment/AOAC_Validation_Guidelines_for_Food_Microbiology-Prepub_version.pdf. Accessed 28 August 2018.

3. Salmonella enterica infections in the United States and assessment of coefficients of variation: a novel approach to identify epidemiologic characteristics of individual serotypes, 1996–2011;Boore;PLoS One,2015

4. Comparative genetics of the inv-spa invasion gene complex of Salmonella enterica;Boyd;J. Bacteriol,1997

5. Salmonella nomenclature;Brenner;J. Clin. Microbiol,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3