Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-7011 [R.A.C.])
2. Mars, Inc., 6885 Elm Street, McLean, Virginia 22101, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACTinvA is a common molecular target for Salmonella-specific detection methods and is recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual as a target for PCR confirmation of putative Salmonella isolates. Novel assays designed for the rapid detection of foodborne pathogens are often validated according to guidelines provided by validation schemes, such as the AOAC International or the International Organization for Standardization. However, these validation guidelines allow for flexibility in the validation study experimental design, which may inflate the assay's ability to detect foodborne pathogens, especially for foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella, exhibiting tremendous species diversity with >2,600 confirmed serovars. This study was conducted to (i) describe the sequence diversity of invA, across a diverse set of Salmonella serovars and (ii) evaluate the ability of two commercially available, AOAC International–validated rapid detection assays to detect a diverse collection of Salmonella spp. strains. In silico analyses identified 362 of 2,058 nucleotide sites that were variable among invA sequences from a diverse collection, representing 86 unique serovars spanning all species and subspecies. Not surprisingly, the majority of variable sites (308 of 2,058) occurred in non–Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica strains, including Salmonella bongori and the other S. enterica subspecies. In vitro testing showed that both rapid detection assays, examined here, failed to detect all Salmonella strains at 1 log above the limit of detection, with assay A failing to detect S. enterica subsp. salamae, and assay B failing to detect S. bongori. Both strains were eventually detected at 100,000 times the limit of detection. Taken together, our study highlights the need to include non–subsp. S. enterica strains in the development and validation of rapid detection methods to limit false-negative test results.HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Salmonella, chap. 5;Andrews;Bacteriological analytical manual,2007
2. AOAC International. 2012. Methods Committee guidelines for validation of microbiological methods for food and environmental surfaces. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD. Available at: http://www.aoac.org/aoac_prod_imis/AOAC_Docs/StandardsDevelopment/AOAC_Validation_Guidelines_for_Food_Microbiology-Prepub_version.pdf. Accessed 28 August 2018.
3. Salmonella enterica infections in the United States and assessment of coefficients of variation: a novel approach to identify epidemiologic characteristics of individual serotypes, 1996–2011;Boore;PLoS One,2015
4. Comparative genetics of the inv-spa invasion gene complex of Salmonella enterica;Boyd;J. Bacteriol,1997
5. Salmonella nomenclature;Brenner;J. Clin. Microbiol,2000
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献