Evaluation of Microbiological Quality of Agricultural Water and Effect of Water Source and Holding Temperature on the Stability of Indicator Organisms' Levels by Seven U.S. Environmental Protection Agency–Approved Methods

Author:

ADHIKARI ACHYUT1,CHHETRI VIJAY SINGH1,CAMAS ANDREA1

Affiliation:

1. School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3778-8754 [A.A.])

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Food Safety Modernization Act Produce Safety Rule requires covered produce growers to monitor the quality of their agricultural water on a regular basis by some U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)–approved methods recognized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In this study, we evaluated the changes in the population of indicator organisms in surface water up to 6 months, and the effects of water source and holding temperature on the survival of indicator organisms by seven EPA-approved methods (five methods for Escherichia coli and two methods for Enterococcus). The levels of E. coli and Enterococcus in the surface water were variable with sampling month, ranging from 1.61 ± 0.04 to 2.68 ± 0.15 log most probable number (MPN)/100 mL and from undetectable level to 1.19 ± 0.29 log MPN/100 mL, respectively. At 25°C (holding temperature), there were significant reductions (P < 0.05) in E. coli and Enterococcus populations in surface water after 48 and 24 h, respectively, whereas at 4°C, no significant changes in the bacterial populations were observed up to 48 h. Methods 1603, 1604, 1103.1, 10029, and Colilert showed a comparable sensitivity in quantifying E. coli, whereas method 1600 and Enterolert showed a variable sensitivity with the type of water. The results indicated that regular monitoring of agricultural water is essential to examine whether the microbial quality of water is appropriate for its intended use. Water samples should be maintained at 4°C to minimize the changes in microbial populations between sampling and testing. The comparison of the sensitivity of EPA methods for quantifying indicator organisms could provide growers with useful information for choosing the method for their water quality analysis. HIGHLIGHTS

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

Reference32 articles.

1. Ashbolt, N. J., Grabow W. O., and SnozziM. 2001. Indicators of microbial water quality, p. 289–316. InFewtrellL. and BartramJ.(ed.),Water quality: guidelines, standards and health. IWA Publishing, London.

2. Boehm, A. B., and SassoubreL. M. 2014. Enterococci as indicators of environmental fecal contamination. InGilmoreM. S.,ClewellD. B.,IkeY., and ShankarN.(ed.),Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection [Internet]. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston.

3. Bushon, R. N., Brady A. M., and LindseyB. D. 2015. Holding-time and method comparisons for the analysis of fecal-indicator bacteria in groundwater. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187: 672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4887-6

4. Castro-Ibáñez, I., Gil M., Tudela J., Ivanek R., and AllendeA. 2015. Assessment of microbial risk factors and impact of meteorological conditions during production of baby spinach in the southeast of Spain. Food Microbiol. 49: 173– 181.

5. Chhetri, V. S. 2018. Effect of surrounding vegetation on microbial survival or die-off on watermelon surface in an agriculture setting. J. Food Saf. 38: e12520. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12520

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3