Affiliation:
1. Department of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695; and
2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
To better understand how consumers perceive food safety risks in retail food store settings, a survey was administered to 1,041 nationally representative participants who evaluated possible food safety risks depicted in selected photographs and self-reported their perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors. Participants were shown 12 photographs taken at retail stores portraying either commonly perceived or actual food safety contributing factors, such as cross-contamination, product and equipment temperatures, worker hygiene, and/or store sanitation practices. Participants were then asked to specifically identify what they saw, comment as to whether what they saw was safe or unsafe, and articulate what actions they would take in response to these situations. In addition to the survey, focus groups were employed to supplement survey findings with qualitative data. Survey respondents identified risk factors for six of nine actual contributing factor photographs >50% of the time: poor produce storage sanitation (86%, n = 899), cross-contamination during meat slicing (72%, n = 750), bare-hand contact of ready-to-eat food in the deli area (67%, n = 698), separation of raw and ready-to-eat food in the seafood case (63%, n = 660), cross-contamination from serving utensils in the deli case (62%, n = 644), and incorrect product storage temperature (51%, n = 528). On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 was very unsafe and 5 was very safe, a significant difference was found between average risk perception scores for photographs of actual contributing factors (score of ca. 2.5) and scores for photographs of perceived contributing factors (score of ca. 2.0). Themes from the focus groups supported the results of the survey and provided additional insight into consumer food safety risk perceptions. The results of this study inform communication interventions for consumers and retail food safety professionals aimed at improving hazard identification.
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference22 articles.
1. Education and training overview;American National Standards Institute,2016
2. Commonly used demographic market research questions;Amplitude Research,2016
3. Berg, B. L.
2000. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 4th ed. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
4. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Braun;Qual. Res. Psychol,2006
5. Surveillance for foodborne-disease outbreaks—United States, 1988–1992;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep,1996
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献