Affiliation:
1. Manitoba Department of Agriculture, Animal Industry Branch, Dairy Laboratory, 545 University Crescent, University of Manitoba Campus, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada and Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, 1354 Eckles Ave., St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
Abstract
Over nine replicate trials, five methods for detecting antibiotic residues were evaluated for sensitivity to various levels of penicillin, erythromycin and chloramphenicol in milk. The methods included (a) the Charm test, (b) Delvotest P, (c) disc assay with Bacillus subtilis on whey agar, (d) B. subtilis on Antibiotic Medium #1 and (e) Difco disc assay method using Bacillus stearothermophilus var. calidolactis on PMI agar. Specific to penicillin only, the Charm test detected the antibiotic 100% of the time down to and including 0.01 unit/ml, dropping to 56% detectability at 0.0025 unit/ml. Delvotest P detected penicillin 100% of the time at 0.025 unit/ml, but at varying degrees of sensitivity through 0.0025 unit/ml, and with evidence of showing false-positive results. Methods (c), (d) and (e) detected penicillin at 0.05 unit/ml 78, 89 and 100% of the time, respectively. Methods (d) and (e) were generally more sensitive to erythromycin and chloramphenicol than either (b) or (c).
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献