Author:
Gajić Anja, ,Arsić Bojana,Ivanović Kristina,Vidojković Sara,Bašić Aleksandra,Maćešić-Petrović Dragana, , , , ,
Abstract
Parents of children with disabilities are eligible to apply for additional services to aid their child in the education process. Parents frequently use the service of shadow teachers, but they often end up unsatisfied with the service and change shadow teachers repeatedly. The aim of this research is to a) examine shadow teachers' beliefs about their obligations; b) determine what are their obligations; c) determine what they believe is their level of proficiency in different areas of shadow teaching position and d) determine the discrepancy between what shadow teachers believe their job should be and what job obligations they were expected to do while shadowing a child. The instrument used was the survey distributed by Manansala & Dizon (2008), it was translated into Serbian language and modified. The sample consisted of 36 students of Faculty for Special education who currently work or have worked in the past as a shadow teacher. Since the sample consisted of shadow teachers who are also students of special education, it is expected that most of the sample believe that they are very proficient in all job areas. There was a huge discrepancy between what they believe is their job obligation and what their job responsibilities are in all five areas. Future research implications and study limitations were discussed. Key words: shadow teachers, inclusion, school, disability.
Reference18 articles.
1. Arsić, B., Todorov, S., Gajić, A., Bašić, A., Macešić-Petrović, D., Zdravković Parezanović, R., Nikolić, J. (2021). The attitudes of students toward people with disabilities and inclusive education. Research in education and rehabilitation, 4(1), 53-67.
2. Jelić, M., & Mihajlović-Babić, S. (2018). Inkluzivna uloga civilnog sektora u pružanju usluga osobama sa invaliditetom u Republici Srbiji [Inclusive role of civil society in the provision of services for disabled persons in the Republic of Serbia]. Megatrend revija, 15(2), 233-254.
3. Bacon, E. H. & Schultz, J. B. (1991). A survey of mainstreaming practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14(2), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F088840649101400211
4. Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2007). Inclusionary Education in Italy: A Literature Review and Call for More Empirical Research. Remedial and Special Education, 28(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F07419325070280020701
5. Damjanović, R. & ĐorĎić, D. (2014). Angažovanje pratioca za ličnu pomoć kao vid neposredne dodatne podrške detetu/učeniku [The engagement of a personal attendant as part of the additional support to children]. In M. Šćepanović (Ed.) MeĎunarodna konferencija „Savremeni defektološki rad: rehabilitacija, prevencija isključenosti i inkluzija” – zbornik rezimea (pp. 68-69). Društvo defektologa Vojvodine.