Abstract
Most states continue building their Armed Forces with the premise of providing security for their citizens. This current process has motivated discussions from favorable and opposing positions. It has become a source of considerable disagreement between political parties, ethnic and religious groups, and even among generations. Because the Armed Forces are associated mainly with the use of force to obtain peace, the training of future military officers in the use of lethal means creates a contradiction in the eyes of many societies. This article demonstrates that the Armed Forces can be seen as a contributor to the socialization of any society. Moreover, they can be perceived as a source of moral strength and the foundation for the development of a nation on different levels.
Publisher
Escuela Militar de Cadetes Jose Maria Cordova
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Safety Research,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference52 articles.
1. Atkinson, C. (2014). Military Soft Power: Public Diplomacy through Military Educational Exchanges. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
2. Beard, M. (2016). SPQR: A history of Ancient Rome. London: Profile Books.
3. Beattie, K. (1998). The Scar That Binds: American Culture and the Vietnam War. New York; London: NYU Press.
4. Beckett, I. (2001). Modern Insurgencies and Counter-insurgencies: Guerrillas and their Opponents since 1750. New York: Routledge.
5. Bessel, R., Guyatt, N., & Rendall, J. (Eds.). (2010). War, Empire and Slavery, 1770-1830. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献